I'm fine with that, it should not be too bad to implement it as a matrix under the hood. I will play with a few different UX ideas for how to control this, based on things I like and don't like from other tools.
-Jon On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:51 AM Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 3/18/2019 8:28 AM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > Am 2019-03-17 20:11, schrieb Jon Evans: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I want to change the color system in PcbNew so that transparency is > >> tied to object type rather than board layer. Color would still be set > >> by layer, but transparency would be settable for things like tracks, > >> component pads, zones, etc. > > > > Hi Jon- > > > > I like the idea. I can see that working well for > > tracks/zones/vias/footprints/etc. > > > > I would still like to keep the option (maybe as a multiplicative > > setting) of changing a layer transparency, at least for user layers. I > > wouldn't want my GDT marks to automatically have the same transparency > > as lines in copper layers, for instance. > > > > -Seth > > I'm siding with Seth on this one. I think adding object transparency is > a good idea but not as a replacement for layer transparency. Layer > transparency has it's uses so object transparency should be complementary. > > Wayne > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
