Ok, I guess that is the safest option and if one requires a track there one could just draw it manually.
lør. 22. jun. 2019 18.52 skrev Jeff Young <[email protected]>: > Yes. > > On 22 Jun 2019, at 17:39, Nick Østergaard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, ok, it os the chamfers. I didn't realise that. What are you > proposing, to remove the spoke if the zone does not touch? > > lør. 22. jun. 2019 18.36 skrev Jeff Young <[email protected]>: > >> There’s no piece of the zone in the middle; that’s just the chamfers on >> the ends of the spokes. >> >> The zone doesn’t go between the two pads because their thermal relief >> value doesn’t allow enough room. >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff. >> >> >> On 22 Jun 2019, at 17:04, Nick Østergaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mmm, I am not sure I under stamd that screenshot. Why are the zone not >> touchimg the thermal track between the pads while it looks like there is a >> part of zone area on the middle of the thermal track? >> >> lør. 22. jun. 2019 17.58 skrev Jeff Young <[email protected]>: >> >>> Our current algorithm will produce thermal connections between two pads >>> (with no connections to the zone): >>> >>> >>> I assume no one will lose any sleep over dropping those? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jeff. >>> >>> >>> On 21 Jun 2019, at 19:49, Jean-Paul Louis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Wayne, >>> >>> Except in very hugh frequency design (higher UHF spectrum, microwaves >>> and millimeter waves) >>> were chamfers can create more problems than they solve. >>> >>> This chamfer should be user optional, the best being individual part >>> layout optional. >>> >>> Just my extra data point, >>> >>> Jean-Paul >>> N1JPL >>> >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2019, at 8:05 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Jeff, >>> >>> Users are going to expect chamfering if there is an option for it. I >>> don't see how you are going to avoid adding chamfering to the spokes >>> unless we decide to do away with chamfering as an option. I don't think >>> that's good idea because right angles on board geometry is generally >>> frowned upon. >>> >>> Wayne >>> >>> On 6/20/19 4:24 PM, Jeff Young wrote: >>> >>> Turns out there’s a slightly unintended side effect. >>> >>> Before: >>> >>> Note the two truncated thermal spokes to the surface-mount pads at the >>> lower right. >>> >>> After: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The bug is fixed, but not that the junctions between the spokes and the >>> zone body are no longer chamfered. >>> >>> I’d say the “after” is better in that respect too, but again it’s >>> definitely different. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jeff. >>> >>> >>> On 20 Jun 2019, at 19:50, Reece Pollack <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> Memory is the second thing to go as one ages. >>> >>> I can't remember what the first one is. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Jeff Young" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>>> >>> *To: *"jp charras" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>>> >>> *Cc: *"KiCad Developers" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>>> >>> *Sent: *Thursday, June 20, 2019 2:46:58 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [Kicad-developers] 6.0 Zone filling differences >>> >>> Wow. That’s sobering. I wrote the board outline clearance changes…. >>> >>> Age sucks. >>> >>> >>> On 20 Jun 2019, at 19:04, jp charras <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> Le 20/06/2019 à 19:24, Jeff Young a écrit : >>> >>> I believe we now have a warning, but I can’t remember what >>> change it was for. I thought it was for the outline changes, >>> but from what I can find on the mailing list archive it looks >>> like we were satisfied that one wouldn’t change anything. >>> >>> So remind me what the warning is for? >>> >>> >>> AFAIK, it is for board outline clearance change (taking in accounf or >>> not the edge cut graphic items thickness, if I correctly remember). >>> Zone outline changes (only activated if the kicad_advanced >>> "ForceThickZones=0" option enables it), do not need any warning. >>> >>> >>> The reason behind this request is that I have a new fill >>> algorithm which fixes a long-standing bug regarding one pad’s >>> thermal ring knocking out another pad’s thermal spoke. It >>> also allows thermal spokes on custom pad shapes (and would >>> allow us to support custom number of spokes if we wished). >>> >>> While this should only change zone fills which would have been >>> considered errors in the past, it nevertheless changes them. >>> What’s the prescription for that? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jeff. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> <PastedGraphic-1.png> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
