On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:10, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What's wrong with setting the minimum boost version to 1.59?
Absolutely nothing; the suggestion of 1.62 was merely a personal opinion. > If this is the version that has the testing features that you need and presumably > all later versions, then this should suffice. I would prefer that we maximize > the number of supported distros whenever possible. Sure! A quick grep says the only current compile-time checks for Boost versions are 1.59 (qa), 1.64 (also qa) and 1.68 (3D viewer cache). Since 1.64 is a no-go at this stage, 1.59 would be a good step forward. (Sorry for the delay in response, I had an unexpected lack of internet access for a couple of days). Cheers Blair
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
