Very hard to find the errors among the epic amount of long warning messages.
The full make would go a long time, then fail. I'd start it again, it would go
for some time, then fail again. Lather. Rinse.
Repeat.
Finally saw these error messages:
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/10.1.0/system_error:278:10: note:
'std::error_condition' defined as 'struct' here
278 | struct error_condition
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from C:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.h:71,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/msw/wrapwin.h:65,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/msw/init.h:19,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/init.h:58,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/app.h:23,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/wx.h:25,
from C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/include/fctsys.h:28,
from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/dialogs/dialog_annotate.cpp:31:
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/erc_settings.h:70:5: error: expected
identifier before numeric constant
70 | ERROR,
| ^~~~~
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/erc_settings.h:70:5: error: expected
'}' before numeric constant
In file included from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/sch_edit_frame.h:40,
from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/dialogs/dialog_annotate.cpp:32:
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/erc_settings.h:67:1: note: to match
this '{'
67 | {
| ^
In file included from C:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.h:71,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/msw/wrapwin.h:65,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/msw/init.h:19,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/init.h:58,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/app.h:23,
from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/wx-3.0/wx/wx.h:25,
from C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/include/fctsys.h:28,
from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/dialogs/dialog_annotate.cpp:31:
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/erc_settings.h:70:5: error: expected
unqualified-id before numeric constant
70 | ERROR,
| ^~~~~
In file included from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/sch_edit_frame.h:40,
from
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/dialogs/dialog_annotate.cpp:32:
C:/msys64/home/kicad-master/kicad/eeschema/erc_settings.h:72:1: error: expected
declaration before '}' token
72 | };
| ^
-----Original Message-----
To: ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org <ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org>
Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net <kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Sent: Sat, Jul 4, 2020 6:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Lots of compile errors after recent source pull
Other headers as well.
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/10.1.0/bits/localefwd.h:125:9: note: replace the
class-key with 'struct'
125 | class ctype_base;
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/10.1.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bits/ctype_base.h:42:10:
note: 'std::ctype_base' defined as 'struct' here
42 | struct ctype_base
| ^~~~~~~~~~
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/10.1.0/bits/valarray_array.h:396:12: note:
'std::_Array<_Tp>' defined as 'struct' here
396 | struct _Array
...as well as the one I originally showed...
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/10.1.0/system_error:54:9: note: replace the
class-key with 'struct'
54 | class error_code;
There may be more, but these are the ones I see repeating over and over. I
tried to do a full build a couple of days ago, and the the build crapped out
part way through. I don't recall the specific error message, but I can try
again and see if it dies. If so, I'll post the info.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian McInerney <ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org>
To: pjmo...@csi.com
Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net <kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Sent: Sat, Jul 4, 2020 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Lots of compile errors after recent source pull
That would probably be because I enabled the warning for "-Wmismatched-tags" on
clang/GCC. This shouldn't be an error though, only a warning. It warns about
declaring things class/struct inconsistently (on MSVC builds this can cause
problems, so I enabled this warning to ensure we don't have issues with this
since we are starting to have more people use MSVC). It appears that the system
headers in GCC don't follow that standard unfortunately, but usually warnings
from inside system headers are ignored (apparently on the C++ headers on my
machine it is also mismatched but I don't see all the warnings when building
with Clang). These are supposed to be hidden when the include directories are
system include directories though.
Do you see this for other headers, or is it just this one header? I wouldn't
mind forwarding this upstream to cleanup their headers.
-Ian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
