The main reason we don't have CI on 5.1 is that I was being lazy and didn't setup any and just focused on getting the master branch CI working since that is what sees the most development.
-Ian On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:49 PM Jon Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > We don't have CI on the 5.1 branch right now. I'm not sure if there is > any reason other than needing to set up additional runner machines, I agree > it would be a good idea. > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:46 AM Marco Ciampa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:12:14AM -0500, Jon Evans wrote: >> > Hi Marco, >> >> Hi Jon, >> >> > I am not part of [email protected] but I am part of this list and >> I can >> > fix the issue you mention, sorry about that... >> >> You see, first I try to fix it myself, then ask others, then ask devs as >> a last resort... >> >> Glad I helped spot a glitch... only thought that bugs me... that should >> be the kind of problem that CI should help detect... I wonder why it >> didn't work? >> >> -- >> >> Saluton, >> Marco Ciampa >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
