I don't see an advantage of creating a 5.0 branch before more issues are fixed
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-doc/issues We don't gain anything by having a 5.0 branch other than wasting valuable time. IMHO. On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 08:13, Marco Ciampa <ciam...@posteo.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 07:04:16PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am 09.10.18 um 14:32 schrieb Marco Ciampa: > > > Forwarding this from the dev mailing list... > > > > > > Please note that Nick is ready to tag 5.0.1 from the 5.0 branch, see: > > > > > > https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-i18n/issues/306 > > > > > >> Unless anyone comments on this issue, that they are working on > > >> translations for 5.0.1, I will tag 5.0.1 tonight. This issue have been > > >> open for comments for almost a month, and the KiCad source has been > > >> tagged. > > > > > > and I agree. So if there is a last-time update, get a move on! > > > > what is about the tree on kicad-doc? > > I will need this update too (if there is one) for packaging kicad. > > kicad-doc has only the master and the old 4.0 branch so I don't know the > > status for this repo. > > The master is (partially) updated for the 5.0 source branch, so, in my > opinion, it should have a 5.0 branch too. > > If all agree we can create the branch. > > Nick? > > -- > > > Marco Ciampa > > I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. > > ------------------------ > > GNU/Linux User #78271 > FSFE fellow #364 > > ------------------------ > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-doc-devs > Post to : kicad-doc-devs@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-doc-devs > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-doc-devs Post to : kicad-doc-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-doc-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
