Oh yes, I didn't think about that. We'll leave it as it is for now, then.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Kerusey Karyu <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any reason to have various footprints such as 0805, 0603, etc. >> for every component type? >> >> There is one rational reason for this, but not such important: Board 3D > presentation. Someone could use different models for resistors, capacitors > and inductors. > > BTW. I have two sets of chip element footprints. One for resistors and > inductors with rectangular outline, and capacitors with rounded outline. It > helps me during first time board assembly process, and when I'm programming > an very old pick and place machine (used for prototypes). > > > > If no one objects, we will go that route. >> >> Apart from the above, I have no objection. > I'm using my own set of footprints. :) > > Kerusey Karyu > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
