Bernd, how do you generate these files? I guess the .kicad_pcb are made from all the parts and then used to generate the .pdfs in footprints_doc? If so, why can't we ditch the .kicad_pcb files in the repo and keep only the .pdfs? Also, how about updating this stuff?
Carl On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Carl Poirier <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh wait. There clearly seems to be a display problem in my pcbnew. It's > not the files. > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Carl Poirier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I added a few more words on the wiki. Doing so, I was wondering >> something. What are the .kicad_pcb and .brd files in the modules directory? >> Opening them with pcbnew doesn't seem to yield much. >> >> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Carl Poirier <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Kerusey Karyu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> I am not sure to understand what you are talking about for the home >>>>> page. Are you talking about describing what a repository is? This would >>>>> be like explaining what github is all about. >>>>> >>>>> I'm talking about this particular repository which is KiCad-Library. >>>> >>>> I do not want to describe what GitHub is because it is already >>>> described elsewhere. I think about a short KiCad-Library presentation. >>>> Not only the people involved in the project can hit at him. >>>> >>>> >>> You mean describing what this particular repository is for, and how its >>> structure works? This sounds good to me. I'll write something up in the >>> next few days. >>> >>> >>>> By the way, thanks for managing the bunch of recent pull requests, it's >>>>> really appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> It was a extremely bumpy road to go. >>>> >>>> I still doesn't have an idea how to finalize this request: >>>> https://github.com/KiCad/SMD_Packages.pretty/pull/12 >>>> >>>> We already have a TO-263-5 in SMD_Packages.pretty so merging D2PAK-5 >>>> may create a little mess. On the other hand I started a discussion >>>> how to improve D2PAK-5 footprint and this has been done. >>>> I'm a bit confused. >>>> >>> >>> If it's better than the original TO-263-5, we overwrite it! I'm thinking >>> we could specify to use the JEDEC name in the convention: >>> >>> 6.1. Name uses JEDEC standard where possible. Ex: "TO-263" instead of >>> "D2PAK" >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Kerusey >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers >>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>> >>> >>> >> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
