I'd say kicad is usefull. I use it for my business and the only drawback that I would have is small component library.
On the other hand, you can always create needed elements.
Recently I made an order for double sided board to be made from my PCB company and they look great.
I prefer to do autorouting and then make manual corrections since autorouting is realy not the best (and I'm being polite :) ).
B.
On 7/29/06,
greg temple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm just wondering what is the current status of kicad is? Is it reasonably usable for multilayer boards?. Is there any lists anywhere that show its currently usability status for doing real boards(without having to do crazy things or having crazy bugs) or any major holdups on necesary features?.
Anyone have some comments?
Thanks in advance
GregSend instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
mag./M.Sc. Boštjan Jerko
Boštjan Jerko-Japina s.p., Raziskovanje in razvoj novih tehnologij
Boštjan Jerko-Japina s.p., Research and development of new technologies
*******************
slovensko: http://www.japina.si
blog: http://www.japina.si/blog
-------------------
English: http://www.japina.eu
blog: http://www.japina.eu/blog __._,_.___
Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting your question.
Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the creator of Kicad.
Please contribute your symbols/modules to the library folder in the group files section.
For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit the kicad-devel group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-devel
SPONSORED LINKS
| Open source software | Symbol software | Symbols |
| Open source |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "kicad-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
__,_._,___
