Hi Dan, Thanks for the feedback, I did see you earlier request. I do agree that cvpcb should not be required. I'm trying to see how I can best live with what currently exists and there seems to be several options that each have some good and some bad points.
It seems to me (in a perfect world) that I should be able to have output targets like "Fine SMT, Fine thought hole, Course SMT and Course through hole." And that these cause different equivalence files to be used. They would use parts from different libraries that are tailored for the manufacturing process we are designing for. Who owns the official libraries? Thanks C.
