--- In [email protected], "Doug Deeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A clue??? > > I dug into the .sch file for the cpu page and did not find any errant > connections between the two pins. I also looked in the netlist file > and found that both pin 40 and 59 of the micro had similar entries. > Pin 40 showed a line: ( 40 /CPU/CEn ) Pin 59 had ( 59 /CPU/CEn) I > deleted the label from pin 59, regenerated the netlist and 59 then had > ( 59 ? ) > After I reapplied the Hlabel to pin 59, the new netlist shows ( 40 > /CPU/WEn ) and ( 59 /CPU/WEn ) > > Anyone have any idea how one pin could get attached/swapped with another? > I redownloaded and reinstalled the 20080522 windows binaries just to > make sure I had the latest, but KiCad and EESCHEMA show 20080429. Any > one know a reason the version/date would be off? > > Regards, > Doug > Hi, I can't see anything obviously wrong with the schematics. Maybe the first letter of the pin name/label is being ignored somehow. Normally leaving whitespace or exotic characters in a label can cause problems, but there aren't any inyour label names. I would try the following. 1/ Set the CEn and WEn pins on the symbol to bidirectional as well as the labels/ports. 2/ Check if there is anything unusual in the description of the 2 pins in the schematic symbol. 3/ Download the very latest SVN snapshot as some work has been done on problems with complex hierarchical schematics. I can't think of anything else to suggest. Let us know if any suggestions work for you. Thanks.
David.
