Hi Heiko,

You are right I missed some rows whenever the similar component is
placed in a different row.

Will update the MS Excel file later as I am transferring to another
web hosting service.

Cheers,
Harold

--- In [email protected], "oecherexpat" <heiko.la...@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Harold,
> 
> Thanks, it's indeed including all my other data to the BOM.
> 
> And I figured another challenge: The BOM has grown further because I
> added some more components. Means, I have some same components further
> down the list. Here's an example:
> 
>  R1   10K   0805
>  R2   10K   0805
>  R3   47K   0805
>  R4   10K   0805
> 
> Looks to me that the macro scan the next line but not the entire file,
> right? The result I see would be for the above example:
> 
>  2    R1, R2    10K    0805
>  1    R3        47K    0805
>  1    R4        10K    0805
> 
> Cheers, Heiko
> 
> P.S. Just saw that you live in NZ, too ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Harold King Tarun"
> <haroldking@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Heiko,
> > 
> > I have released an updated version. This includes processing of all
> > used column even when you have manually inserted a column or not plus
> > all the checked fields from Eeschema. Any features you want to include
> > kindly drop me a line.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Harold
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "oecherexpat" <heiko.lange@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Harold,
> > > 
> > > Thanks a lot, it is in fact a real help in generating BOMs.
> > > 
> > > However, I am squeezing everithing out of Kicad, that's - I guess -
> > > the reason why on my system it did only half the job by leaving
quite
> > > some lines unconsilidated and only uses the first 3 columns. 
> > > 
> > > Let me explain: Instead of using simple names for schematic
components
> > > like "10K" I rather use long and complex names like
> > > "10K_1%_W125_0805". Reason is that I use the name as part identifier
> > > ans link these to a unique stock/order number and some other
> > > information within the extra fields. Means, I am using most of the
> > > remaining fields. 
> > > 
> > > I am also not sure, how compatible the different MS-Office versions
> > > are in terms of handling macros. I am currently using Office 2007.
> > > 
> > > I'll run more tests and will try to impove the macro but
unfortunately
> > > I am flat out with the job for the next few weeks :-(
> > > 
> > > Cheers, Heiko
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Harold King Tarun"
> > > <haroldking@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Heiko,
> > > > 
> > > > Here's the MS Excel that you need to consolidate your BOM
(including
> > > > instructions on how to use it). Hope you find it useful. You
can get
> > > > the instructions here http://cybercircuits.co.cc/blog/?p=13
> > > > 
> > > > Any bug kindly let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Harold
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], "oecherexpat" <heiko.lange@>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Kicad always creates the BOM with one part per line only. A
> > suggestion
> > > > > to add a function was aparently never implemented (I found
> some nice
> > > > > screenshots in the files area).
> > > > > So, what I need is a tool that creates out of this:
> > > > > R1   10K   0805
> > > > > R2   10K   0805
> > > > > R3   47K   0805
> > > > > 
> > > > > something like this:
> > > > > 2    R1, R2    10K    0805
> > > > > 1    R3        47K    0805
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does anyone have a solution how to create consolidated BOMs by
> using
> > > > > Openoffice (or MS-Office)?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,       Heiko
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to