Andy Eskelson wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:15:37 -0700 > Joerg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Andy Eskelson wrote: >>> Sorry about the multiple posts. >>> The mailserver was dooing silly things and timing out, but it seemed to >>> be sending the messages anyway. >>> >> Mine does that too at times (AT&T). But it has gotten better over the >> last couple of years. It's the SBC-Global server in San Francisco. > It looks like the problem is that the mailserver is not sending a success > response for the message sent. I've alerted the ops staff. >
Meantime I tend to click those "not sent successfully" messages away because almost all the time it posts anyhow, sometimes with quite a delay. With AT&T it took the effort to "escalate" to the next supervisor level to take a look at times. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
