> Thank you for the detailed description of a challenging process. I > wouldn't have the patience any more.
Thanks; the alternatives for me would have required even more effort, so I was rather driven :). Once one knows what has to be done, it's not too bad (especially if you have control over the production of the mechanical drawings). > The 393 is the inverse of 254 (mm/in mod 10) so it appears that > something somewhere thought there were imperial units in use. I > would guess that 1.0 (or decimal multiples thereof) 254 (and decimal > multiples thereof) and 393 (and, yes, decimal multiples thereof) will > be the only converson factors needed. >doh!< How did I miss that?! I was forgetting that Kicad uses imperial base units. Regards, Robert.
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.113/2573 - Release Date: 12/18/09 07:35:00
