On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:59:47 -0000
It's a rather "hidden" function :-)


When you draw the graphic line, if you right click on it and select
properties there is a tick box - "common to units" 

Untick this and the graphic will appear only on the current part selected.

Andy




"bbt5001" <mo...@bluebelttech.com> wrote:

> The library editor in eeschema permits the creation of multi-part devices. 
> So, if I have quad pack of NAND gates I can draw one and have the graphic to 
> be the same for all parts.
> 
> But what if the parts are not identical?  I know I can have unique text and 
> pin numbers, but I can not figure out how to have the Part A graphics differ 
> from the Part B graphics. Any line I modify on A is modified on B (and C) as 
> well.
> 
> The part I'm trying to create is the Avago HCNR200 optocoupler. This consists 
> of one internal LED and two photo diodes (PD1 and PD2).  I *could* create the 
> eeschemea model as one library part with all the components in one box, but 
> that forces my schematics to conform to the physical package constraints. The 
> correct approach is to have these as 3 independent parts so that they can be 
> placed in the schematic according to the functional flow. For example, I 
> should be able to place PD2, the isolated photo diode, on the sheet for the 
> isolation circuits, while LED and PD1 are on a different sheet.
> 
> This could be extended to something like a relay: schematically, the coil 
> should be separable from the contacts.
> 
> Can this be done KiCad?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting your 
> question.
> Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the creator of 
> Kicad.
> Please visit http://www.kicadlib.org for details of how to contribute your 
> symbols/modules to the kicad library.
> For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit the 
> kicad-devel group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-develYahoo! Groups 
> Links
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to