Re: [KIM-discussion] Problem with multiple document annotation

[borislav popov]

Hi Alvaro,     indeed it is boring to have duplications :) The sync method is the right one to use. But as you have seen it requires a KIMDoc as a parameter. The envisaged workflow is like this:     a new document comes to the system     you process it and store it     then if you like to re-process it, you find it in the repository, reannotate something or change some doc-level features and then you sync it. If this is your scenario - then this is how it is supposed to work. On the other hand, if you are passing the same corpus N times to the server you would get N versions of each document in it. Tell us your scenario and we will try to come up with a suggestion. all the best to you borislav Alvaro Hernandez wrote: Hi everybody, I'm trying to have only one annotation about a document in the store.   I realized that when I store a document more than once (using the storeDoc method), KIM stores it every time I use this method.   However, I want only one occurrence of the document in the store.   I found the sync method, but first I need to know if the document was previously stored. I didn`t found how to do that, using the API.   Could you please help me ??   Thank you, Alvaro Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. _______________________________________________ NOTE: Please REPLY TO ALL to ensure that your reply reaches all members of this mailing list. KIM-discussion mailing list KIM-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion_ontotext.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14 - Release Date: 9/10/2007 12:00 AM

_______________________________________________
NOTE: Please REPLY TO ALL to ensure that your reply reaches all members of this 
mailing list.

KIM-discussion mailing list
KIM-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion_ontotext.com