Hi,
Actually the "class" and "inst" features of the annotations is how you
map the annotations to the instances in the semantic repository. In
this particular case, what KIM will do is - it will see that the
annotation has a "class" ant not an "inst" and create an entity in the
semantic repository with unique instance URI and of that particular
class and put the instance URI as an "inst" feature of the annotation
(that is done by the Instance Generator PR ) . This is why your code
actually works and does not throw an error. It is your job to make sure
the class in the "class" feature is a valid ontology class indeed.
Greetings,
Philip
On 07/21/2009 06:30 PM, ipinkfl...@inwind.it wrote:
Hi all,
I wrote this rule
Rule:Avvocato
Priority: 100
// avv. Carlo Rossi
( {Token.string== "avv"}
({Token.string == "."})?
(PERSONA)
): avvocato -->
:avvocato.Person={kind = "positive", rule = "Avvocato", class =
"http//mia.ontologia#AVVOCATO"}
This rule works correctly , but I don't understand why , if the class
AVVOCATO doesn't exist in my ontology (http//mia.ontologia#) . In this way I
have not associate this rule with my ontology. Must Kim give me an error?
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
Kim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
Kim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
