Borislav,

Along the same lines, is there any official documentation (such as a VENN 
diagram) or can you provide me with a VENN diagram type of description of 
features that distinguishes what features are in GATE compared to what is in 
KIM and any respective overlap? The reason I ask is that KIM seems to include 
so many characteristics that I am having trouble identifying where KIM starts 
and where GATE begins. As an example, you made mention that  the functionality 
in KIM deals with co-occurrence of specific entities. GATE also provides this 
capability in the manner of their orthographic co reference. However it seems 
as if KIM takes advantage of additional ontology's not accessible to GATE. 
Please let me know if my question does not make sense. Thanks again for 
responding quickly and I look forward to hearing from you in regard to this 
matter.

Thanks,
Dave
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion

Reply via email to