Dear Mr Fontes, All,
Thank you for your input. We consider RDFa support a priority as well.
Would you mind answering a few questions on the details of that support?
We intend to support RDFa and not Microdata or Microformats. Obviously,
we are partial to solutions that use RDF? Do you prefer RDFa or Microdata ?
We intend to support RDFa in three ways:
- the output of the semantic annotation can be received in RDFa format
- if you find a document through our web interface, you will be able
to download it in RDFa*
- when you browse annotated documents in the web interface (like this
one - http://bit.ly/onto_document_sample) , their XHTML view will
contain RDFa
Do you have any other uses that may apply to the current KIM ?
We intend to use our regular PROTON ontology to describe the metadata in
RDFa. Do you think that this will affect the utility of the metadata?
Thank you,
Marin Nozhchev,
Project Manager, KIM Platform
* It is currently possible to export the document in GATE XML format.
Try clicking Export near the top right corner of that link -
http://bit.ly/onto_document_sample
On 11.03.2010 19:33 ?., Celso Fontes wrote:
* RDFa and/or Microdata support !!!!
2010/3/11 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Dear friends,
At some point we froze the evaluation version of KIM to 2.4, but
down in the basement, we continue to hammer the current version
KIM 3.0 - new architecture, new scale, new possibilities. In this
process we have been customizing it for various customers, but
there should be a moment when this becomes available for
evaluation as well. We have planned this moment to be in May 2010.
This time, we would like to hear from all of you - who evaluated,
used or bought our solutions:
What suggestions, ideas and features requests do you have?
Thanks for staying in touch!
Yours: Ontotext.
www.ontotext.com <http://www.ontotext.com>
p.s. Please notify us if you consider this email as spam. Please
excuse us.
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
