Hello, Philip,
It still doesn't work... Currently the domain of producedBy is
protonu#ProductModel and protont#Drill_Fluid_Additive, and the range
is protont#agent and protont#FluidSupplier. I am wondering if the
definition is problematic?
Sorry for bothering you so much and thank you for your suggestion!
Fangkai
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Philip Alexiev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Try to remove Tomcat's cache ( $TOMCAT/webapps/KIM/ , $TOMCAT/work/* )
>
> Also make sure, that the class "drill_fluid_additive" is visible, that is -
> this statement exists in the semantic repository:
>
> <drill_fluid_additive>
> <http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/kimso#visibilityLevel1> "" .
>
>
> On 06/22/2010 09:07 PM, Yang Fangkai wrote:
>>
>> Hello, Philip,
>>
>> Question 1 and 3 have been solved, but it seems question 2 is
>> still unresolved. In Protege, I have added Drill_fluid_additive as a
>> domain of producedBy, but in WebGUI it still doesn't show up...
>>
>> Thank you so much for your help!
>>
>> Fangkai
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Philip Alexiev
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Yang,
>>>
>>> You will find the answers inline the document.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/22/2010 04:27 PM, Yang Fangkai wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello, Philip,
>>>>
>>>> Please find the attached file. In this file, there are
>>>> three "drill_fluid_additive" instances whose names begin with "SAFE".
>>>> All classes and properties have been defined in protont,owl properly
>>>> (and with a rdfs:label attribute for each class, in particular,
>>>> drill_fluid_additive is defined as a subclass of protont#material
>>>> which is a subclass of protont#object), and declared visible. After
>>>> importing this file by toolRDFImport.cmd, I have the following
>>>> problem:
>>>>
>>>> 1. query: query instances for all "drill_fluid_additive",
>>>> all instances are retrieved; query instances for all
>>>> "drill_fluid_additive" starting with "SAFE", no result is returned.
>>>> The same problem occurs when I use these triples (either in RDF or in
>>>> N-Triple format) as a separate knowledge base that loaded by Sesame,
>>>> instead of importing triples by toolRDFImport.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Basically, KIM operates in two modes - using labels, or aliases. This is
>>> configured in $KIM_HOME/config/install.properties in
>>> com.ontotext.kim.KIMConstants.ENTITY_DESCR property.
>>> - Labels - more simple and more compact. Generally what is required is
>>> that
>>> each entity has at least a protons:mainLabel, and different optional
>>> rdfs:label descriptions.
>>> - Aliases - uses aliases, which are objects by themselves, to describe
>>> the
>>> entities. The idea is to be able to have meta information for the labels.
>>> This is the default model KIM uses.
>>> In your case you provided a label, but your model is most probably
>>> "Aliases". And, of course, you should also provide a mainAlias/mainLabel
>>> .
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. In Protege, I define a restriction "producedBy" for
>>>> drill_fluid_additive, linking the entity to its manufacturers, but in
>>>> WebGUI, after selecting X as an entity of "drill_fluid_additive", I
>>>> cannot select property "producedBy" in the drag-down box below it. But
>>>> for other three properties (e.g., primaryFunction, etc.) I can. I am
>>>> wondering why.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Try setting "drill_fluid_additive" as a domain of the property
>>> "producedBy"
>>> .
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. The manufacturer locates in Houston, TX. How can I relate
>>>> the "Houston" in this newly imported RDF to the city "Houston" defined
>>>> in KIM wkb.nt? Because I want to take advantage of the underlying
>>>> geographic information in KIM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Use the URI of Houston from the wkb.nt :
>>> <Manufacturer> <http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protont#locatedIn>
>>> <http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#City_T.2949> .
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you so much for your help!
>>>>
>>>> Fangkai
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> Philip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
