Hi Naaman, This is interesting behavior. Generally, we don't delete documents in our scenarios where we use KIM, so there is a slight possibility that this is a bug. I will try to reproduce it.
Thank you for your feedback. All the best Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM Team On Nov 25, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Naaman Musawwir wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Kim 3.0 RC4 on Windows and Linux, same configuration with Lucene > database setting and Java API to connect to KIM instance and carry out > operations. While trying to add/delete/load documents I see some > inconsistency in results and need help regarding correct use of the API. > > Here is what I do and get as a result: > > DocumentRepositoryAPI apiDR; > > 1. Create two documents using CorporaAPI.createDocument() and add those > to document repository using apiDR.adDocument() just like given in the > example. Documents added successfully. > 2. Loaded documents using apiDR.getDocumentIds(new DocumentQuery()). It > returned all two documents fine. I also tested using > apiDR.getDocumentCount(new DocumentQuery()). It also gave correct result as > two. > 3. Then I deleted all the documents using > apiDR.clear(DocumentRepositoryAPI.CLEAR_COMMAND_ALL);. > 4. Now I retrieved documents again as step 2 above. There was no effect > on the repository and same two documents were returned. Is it the correct > behaviour? > 5. I tried to delete the documents one by one using > apiDR.deleteDocument(docID). Here are the confusions in this step > a. I tried to retrieve documents using apiDR.getDocumentIds(new > DocumentQuery()). Behavior is unexpected as it returned 2 documents, but no > document could be loaded using apiDR.loadDocument(docID). I tried to get the > count using apiDR.getDocumentCount(new DocumentQuery()). It returned 2, also. > b. I shutdown KIM server and restart. Now I try to retrieve documents > as step 2. Now the deletion seemed to work as the count and list count in > step 2 both were 0? > > > Please explain if it is the expected behavior. > > Regards, > Naaman Musawwir. > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion@ontotext.com > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
_______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
