http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/interviews/4495/1/
link diatas menceritakan wawancara dari director of Purdue's Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security kayaknya open source tidaklah seaman yang dulu, seperti yang dikatakan bahwa, Another response is: "Because it's open source; it's easier to fix." Maybe. It depends on where the code's used. If it's used in a certified environment or an embedded application, and from my standpoint, whether or not I can do all the maintenance on my own car... if I have to go back and install a fix to the breaks every time it crashes and kills somebody, I don't view that as more secure. Secure means it doesn't need the patches. It's done right the same time. So the people who are saying that their code is more secure and it still needs patches every other week--whether it's proprietary or open source--are playing fast and loose with the semantics of what security means. so gimn donk, enaknya pake OS apa? gimn pendapat para ahli linux disini?? ada tanggapan atau komentar? -- ichtus ------ Lewi Supranata .K ICQ: 50643061 About Me : http://lewi.f4boys.com Homepage : http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus GnuPG Public Key : http://mercury7.petra.ac.id/~ichtus/ichtus-keys2
msg03115/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Jumlah pelanggan (updated daily): 182 Untuk berhenti berlangganan, kirim email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arsip milis, hyperlink: http://www.mail-archive.com/klas-talk@;regex.com/
