I think there is a mistake.
Please see the red lines of your patch.

     if (WriteTestInfo) {
       double elapsed_time = util::getWallTime() - start_time;
       std::ostream *f = openTestFile("info", id);
      if(f) {
*f << "Time to generate test case: "
   << elapsed_time << "s\n";
delete f;
*      }*
*    } else {     *
*      klee_error("unable to open output test case .info file");*
*    }*
   }
 }

I think the correct code should be the following

     if (WriteTestInfo) {
       double elapsed_time = util::getWallTime() - start_time;
       std::ostream *f = openTestFile("info", id);
      if(f) {
*f << "Time to generate test case: "
   << elapsed_time << "s\n";
delete f;
*      }** else {     *
*        klee_error("unable to open output test case .info file");*
*      }*
   }


Best

Heechul


On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Cristian Zamfir <cristian.zamfir at 
epfl.ch>wrote:

>
> Hi Cristi,
>
> You are right, I doubt that the reasons for running out of fds are
> transient, so it is better to stop. I modified the patch.
>
>
>
> Cristi
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Cristian Cadar wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Cristi,
> >
> > That's a good patch.  I'm just wondering if there's really any benefit of
> continuing execution once KLEE runs out of file descriptors.  That is, we
> could instead just call klee_error instead of klee_warning in
> openOutputFile.
> >
> > Best,
> > Cristian
> >
> > On 16/07/10 17:04, Cristian Zamfir wrote:
> >> This happens when Klee runs out of file descriptors. You can avoid it by
> increasing the number of file descriptors using ulimit.
> >>
> >> The crash happens because callers of openTestFile do not check if the
> return is NULL.
> >> We encountered this problem before. The attached patch should fix it, in
> the sense that it avoids crashing and prints a warning instead. If it is ok,
> I can commit it.
> >>
> >> Cristi
> >>
>
>
>


-- 

Heechul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://keeda.Stanford.EDU/pipermail/klee-dev/attachments/20100725/b7804c14/attachment.html
 

Reply via email to