https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508808
jesse <jvap...@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvap...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #4 from jesse <jvap...@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Ingo Klöcker from comment #2)
> I'm wondering if it makes sense to allow different payers/payees in a split
> transaction. What's the use case? I think the actual bug is that the
> Payer/Payee box is available/shown in the split editor.
Wouldn't the use case, if I am understanding the question correctly, be
something like the following:
Friends and I go out to eat. The restaurant only accepts one check/ticker per
table.
I pay the check and my friends agree to pay me back.
When enter that transaction I may want to break it up.
The category would still be dining but I would split it by payee so I can track
how much each person owes. I could also do that with accounts for each person
but that may lead to multiple accounts I may not use often.
Another use case.
When I pay my mortgage, a portion goes to the bank for interest, a portion to
the principal of the loan(usually still the bank) and a portion goes to
"escrow" which is insurance and taxes. If I want to track the insurance and
taxes payees I would probably need this functionality.
I can try to think of more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
