Hi, On 11 August 2015 at 23:37, iorecvsendclose <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone used the rosedb or dnsproxy modules extensively in production? > I'm concerned about whether it would reliably scale as well as Knot does > without it. I'm evaluating knot in hopes that I can use it to offer part of > my would-be service to potentially millions of websites. I'm planning a free > usage tier would would hopefully be heavily utilized.
rosedb will scale, dnsproxy may (if you have a good link to the original nameserver), and may not (if the original nameserver is slow), as it's synchronous. There's someone who has a similar use case to yours and is making the dnsproxy asynchronous. > Regarding the specific implementation, I want to provide an authoritative > DNS server that returns predefined values based on record types/host > (rosedb). If the host/record combo conditions aren't met, proxy the request > to the original nameserver(s). After reviewing the nightly code it looks > like I'll likely need to invest a lot of time in order to support that > chained query plan. > > Thank you for any feedback in advance. > -Anonymous Coward That sounds like a filtering use case to me, rosedb and dnsproxy should be a good fit. There are a few gotchas with the rosedb (e.g. no automatic DNSSEC), but you probably know that. Best, Marek > _______________________________________________ > knot-dns-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users > _______________________________________________ knot-dns-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
