Hi Conrad,

Thanks for the patch :-) If such a feature is useful for someone, we could 
extend
the geoip module. I think it would be better than creating another module with
similar functionality.

Best,
Daniel

On 2/18/19 6:18 PM, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi there!
> 
> At work, we make use something often referred to as "weighted records",
> a feature offered by many managed DNS vendors. We use it to implement
> e.g. a canary environment, where we test changes on a small portion of
> production traffic.
> 
> I played around with knot-dns for a bit (quite impressed), and figured
> it might be nice to implement such a feature for it. Turns out, the code
> is so amazing that if you abuse the infrastructure of the geoip module,
> it only takes an hour (very impressed).
> 
> If you are interested in trying it, read on further below, but just to
> state my intention: I was wondering if such a feature would be of
> interest at all?
> 
> I realize the geoip module may not be the appropriate for such an
> implementation, consider this merely a demo of sorts.
> 
> So here goes nothing:
> 
> 1. apply attached patch
> 2. config file snippet:
> 
> mod-geoip:
>   - id: test
>     config-file: /etc/knot/test.conf
>     ttl: 600
>     mode: weighted
> 
> zone:
>   - domain: example.com.
>     file: "/var/lib/knot/example.com.zone"
>     module: mod-geoip/test
> 
> 3. /etc/knot/test.conf:
> 
> lb.example.com:
>   - weight: 10
>     CNAME: www1.example.com.
>   - weight: 5
>     CNAME: www2.example.com.
> 
> Results in this:
> 
> conrad@deltree ~/hack/knot-dns $ for i in $(seq 1 100); do dig
> @192.168.1.242 A lb.example.com +short; done | sort | uniq -c
>      68 www1.example.com.
>      32 www2.example.com.
> conrad@deltree ~/hack/knot-dns $ for i in $(seq 1 100); do dig
> @192.168.1.242 A lb.example.com +short; done | sort | uniq -c
>      72 www1.example.com.
>      28 www2.example.com.
> conrad@deltree ~/hack/knot-dns $ for i in $(seq 1 100); do dig
> @192.168.1.242 A lb.example.com +short; done | sort | uniq -c
>      66 www1.example.com.
>      34 www2.example.com.
> 
> 
> You get the idea. Anyways, any thoughts and feedback would be greatly
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Conrad
> 
> 
-- 
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users

Reply via email to