http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5839
--- Comment #10 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> 2011-03-30 13:47:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created attachment 3517 [details] > Adding new index stocknumber on field 952$i Katrin: Could you check on the following? In bib1.att 1028 is already conform LOC standard: Stock-number. Should we use that one instead of adding 1062? You could also add a line: stocknumber Stock-number Note too that 1062 is in the reserved LOC range. You could better pick a number in the 8XXX range as has been done for item attributes already. Furthermore, I already signed the first patch. But this second patch makes me wonder if we not better mention it: inventory number? That would also make the choice for a new number 8XXX more acceptable. I will send a mail to the dev list for the name issue. After that I would be happy to sign a revised patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
