http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4888
--- Comment #12 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> 2011-04-08 13:19:57 UTC --- I have a design problem with this patch. * marc_indicators marc_indicators_value => couldn't those table just be a field on marc_tag_structure ? * marc_indicators_values => this table sounds useless for me, it's a constant table, why not use a Perl array ? Something like 2 fields: default_indicator1 enum('','0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','a','b','c','d'...'z'); default_indicator2 enum('','0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','a','b','c','d'...'z'); in marc_tag_structure are they not doing the same thing ? Otherwise, I like the idea & like the fact you can have control over the valid values of indicators (even if, but i'm not a librarian), I still think most indicators are just here for cutting hairs in 4 -frenchism suspected-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
