http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6198
Jane Wagner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Jane Wagner <[email protected]> 2011-04-17 14:58:50 UTC --- I don't think using 001 is necessarily a good idea. For many US libraries using OCLC, the 001 is where the OCLC number lives. That's a sufficiently large number of databases to have to take into account. If your setup will work with the OCLC number, it may not be a problem. But if it has to be a unique number to the system/record, it will be. What about another field? A lot of libraries also use the 035 for either OCLC or system-derived numbers (Unicorn especially), so that's probably not a good one either. In USMARC (not sure about UNIMARC), the biblionumber is being mapped into the 999c in the default biblioitems Koha to MARC mapping. Can this be used or adapted? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
