http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5459
Joe Atzberger <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Joe Atzberger <[email protected]> 2011-06-10 15:52:48 UTC --- Doing anything with reordering holds can introduce some complexity. As a baseline, we might expect to resort the combined holds by their original datestamps. Is that agreeable? But all kinds of policy/priority mess can be interjected as well, like taking into account the current locations of the items, the owning branches, etc. I want to ignore that. I also want to explicitly ignore any idea of sending notices to the patrons about their new hold priority. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
