http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6285
Chris Cormack <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Patch Status|Passed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #4 from Chris Cormack <[email protected]> 2011-08-10 19:02:30 UTC --- The proposal for QA was "a) he would not mark any patch he himself has written as Passed QA b) any patch written by BibLibre would need a signoff from another, external person before he'd test it c) he would start with the patches that have been waiting the longest d) the QAM and RM could reject any "Passed QA" patch if they feel it's not sufficient for whatever reason (which would need to be noted in the bug report)" So even though this is a trivial patch like you say, I would like us to follow the rules we made for ourselves. Ian can you take a look at this too please. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
