http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
--- Comment #15 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- Hi Matthias, Katrin, So.. the requirement to include http/https in the OpacBaseURL is not a regression caused by this patch. I personally still feel it's wrong, but I can't see it as a reason to fail this particular patch. However, agreeing with Tomas's original point. Could you/julian provide some test code that proves the original assumption regarding url_param not taking note of deleted params? Neither me, nor Tomas could prove this in our tests so we're not really sure that this patch fixes the issue as coincidence, or is actually solving the problem outright. As for the OPACBaseURL stuff, we should move that conversation to one of the other related bugs and maybe open a further bug to remind us that it should also be resolved for the CAS case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
