http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12719
--- Comment #1 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- Of course, even with accurate documentation, there would still be some "problems": In regards to the 035, for it to formed according to the MARC spec, it should be stored like so: (MarcOrgCode)00000000 (DNLM)D006356Q000628 Where MarcOrgCode should come from the 003 and 00000000 from the 001... -- Library of Congress records should already also store their 001 in the 010... while other national bibliographic agencies can store the number in the 016$a and store the MarcOrgCode in the $2. If I understand that correctly, you could keep control numbers for the National Library of Medicine like so: 016 $a D006356Q000628 $2 DNLM -- Personally, I find value in storing the 001, because you can look up that record in the system you retrieved it from. In the case of bibliographic or authority records, you should be able to use this preserved value for matching purposes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
