http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12407
Fred P <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #15 from Fred P <[email protected]> --- Great job solving this, but we continue to have issues defining multiple phone numbers. Why do we maintain four separate phone numbers: Primary, secondary, other and SMS number? Most people have a mobile phone - that should be listed first - the SMS number does not need to be a separate field from mobile. Some people have a landline, work phone or alternate number, however Koha doesn't use these alternate numbers, they are only used by Circulation staff, and in our system they are redundant and do not get used. How many people have four phone numbers? Two fields and a duplication of mobile to SMS is sufficient. Maybe a plus sign to add additional numbers if absolutely necessary. By confusing primary, secondary, other and SMS, we get confusion about which field means what. Labeling one number as "Mobile" seems like a logical solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
