http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11518
--- Comment #28 from M. de Rooy <[email protected]> --- There still is some discussion about it (see IRC): Why do we use $self->biblioitemnumber()->itemtype() ? $self->biblioitem->itemtype would be nicer. My answer would be: Since the relation is called biblioitemnumber, we need to use that. Using the default relation name from DBIx is easier than adding names everywhere. Same for e.g. $biblioitem->biblionumber() instead of biblio. The generated relation is called biblionumber.. My question is: can we somehow get DBIx to define these relations with the names we like more without adding relation or code in the custom sections everywhere? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
