http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13157
Bug ID: 13157
Summary: improving facet definitions for unimarc
Change sponsored?: ---
Product: Koha
Version: master
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5 - low
Component: Searching
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
QA Contact: [email protected]
The new code for facets calculation could probably be more precise for unimarc
(in biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml)
- for series, 410 tag is probably better than 225
- the date and place subdivisions 6XX$y and 6XX$z could be indexed (in su-geo
and su-chrono)
- the subdivisionn $x is indexed for 606, but all 6XX$x could also be indexed
(in su-to)
- 5XX are not subjects, so I'm not sure that indexing them in su-ut is good
(but we should check in ccl.properties how this index is defined). Anyway, I
always found that indexing 5XX was a weird idea...
and there is maybe a mistake for 995$b - holdingbranch (should be 995$c)
M. Saby
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
