http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12123
David Cook <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- Thinking again... I can see the merit of using an iframe instead of a div. After all, the div only works because "p" and "blockquote" can be children of a "div". If a person put "html" and "body" tags into the message, those the HTML would be invalid. *does a test* Mmm, instead of busting the notice viewer, Chrome removes the "html" and "body" tags. (So the viewer continues to work fine, although you'll still notice the "html" and "body" tags in the message_queue.) I've noticed libraries put "html" and "body" tags in their notices before, which is why this comes into my mind. Chrome is pretty rad at cleaning up tag soup, but I'm not sure about Firefox or Internet Explorer... Microsoft Outlook seems capable of handling a HTML email with "html" and "body" tags inside of a "body" tag. I suppose most email clients are pretty flexible when it comes to invalid HTML markup. In any case, I think Liz's solution works. If any problems arise in the future, I suppose we can address them then. (Or possibly strip "body" and "html" tags when saving notice templates.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
