http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13431
--- Comment #17 from Robin Sheat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jacek Ablewicz from comment #11) > However, such test case is pretty artificial - things may be different for > syspref caching, authorized values caching, how would it behave on heavily Latency too, i.e. if you are using a separate MySQL server (which is a recommended configuration, imo) then having things local may be an improvement. > On the other hand, I wonder how many people in the wild may be actually > using CACHING_SYSTEM=fastmmap_cache (or are even aware of such possibility)? > Interesting thing about fastmmap_cache is that it is currently never used by > default nor as a fallback mechanism (at least not since Bug 12041). But it Yeah, it's not recommended to use fastmmap_cache unless you have good cause to due to it not supporting expiry. I'd be quite OK with disabling the init of it and starting the functions with a 'confess "not implemented due to bug 13431"' if an attempt to use it is made. We can always fix it up later should we discover a need. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
