http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13381
David Cook <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- This is certainly an interesting one. As LOC notes, the AACR2 GMD is replaced by the 336, 337, and 338 in RDA. As a result, I'm not sure about putting the 245$h into its own "Medium" field, as the 337 already represents "Media type". However, I don't think it would be a good idea to put the GMD into the "Media type" field if a 337 isn't available. If a record has a GMD, I think librarians would expect to see it in the title. I suppose a patron might expect to see it in a Medium field... but I think having Medium/Media would be confusing, especially if a record accidentally has a 245$h and a 337... I don't know. The "funny" thing about MARC is that we could also be determining medium from the 007 or the leader or a combination... In a way, there are too many options and none of them are consistently helpful to end users :S. I don't like the idea of cluttering a screen with all the different format options, but re-using labels can also be confusing. Of course, at the end of the day, we use custom XSLTs for everyone, so I don't have too much of a vested interest in this one, except apart from not wanting to overly customize our own versions. -- As a side note, why do we want to add the statement of responsibility back into the top of the record? Is that a RDA requirement? It looks awful... while it might be something librarians like, I imagine patrons wouldn't like it too much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
