http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10943
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #8 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #7) > Hm, wondering if the other way around would make more sense: > Allow paying fines without the permission to manage borrowers. > > I think the permission page doesn't suggest that you'd need to combine both. > > What do people think? I would agree with Katrin. It should be possible to deal with fines and charges while not having the ability to edit the patron's details. That gives more flexibility for permissions, whereas this implementation gives less flexibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
