http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
--- Comment #15 from Jacek Ablewicz <a...@biblos.pk.edu.pl> --- Not sure what to think about patch #2 (Bug 13645: Use DBIx::Connector) - is it needed for patch #1 or patch #3 (from Bug 13690) to work properly? I'm not seeing any measurable performance gains with patch #2 (on the contrary, in most test performed so far it seems to be a little bit slower to me - but in any case, the differences are insignificant, +3/-2 msec or so); same results when tested alone, or in combination with #1 and #3. Generally, DBIx::Connector looks like a move in the right direction (I guess it should improve stability/DBI connection handling safety in persistent environments, at least in theory ?), but in comparison with #1 & #3, it would be a lot harder to evaluate it for possible regressions, issues etc. While testing #2 I found one issue (Bug 13699), but this bug is also reproducible in unpatched master :). BTW, DBIx::Connector is not on the dependencies list (don't know if it needs to be added, on my test setup I had this module package already installed because I was toying with it previously). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/