http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13383
--- Comment #6 from [email protected] --- Thanks for catching that, Winona! I think this should be included in the fix, as it was just overlooked and is the equivalent of the $e in the 100/110s. (In reply to Winona Salesky from comment #5) > Also, while working on this I noticed that the relator code for field 111 is > actually subfield j, should I add that change into this fix as well? This is > not handled by the current version of the stylesheet. > Thanks, > -Winona > > > (In reply to Winona Salesky from comment #4) > > Should there be a separator? Or should each be on their own line? > > -Winona > > > > (In reply to rgravel from comment #3) > > > I agree with Katrin about the $4 and $e conflict- always favor the term > > > over > > > the code, as that is what patrons will more readily understand. > > > > > > I also still like the vertical bar as a separator for the reasons I > > > mentioned in Bug 13382. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
