http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13383
--- Comment #19 from Winona Salesky <[email protected]> --- Just waiting until 13382 gets pushed to master. There are some contradictions in the two, it will be easier to work from the latest version. -Winona (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #18) > I think no one has objected so you could go ahead and add > > (In reply to Winona Salesky from comment #17) > > I don't see any reason not to include the 100$j, if no one objects I will > > add it. > > -Winona > > > > > > (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #16) > > > Okay, fixed what I saw before but noticed new issue: > > > > > > -Multiple relator terms/codes do seem to be showing (only shows first > > > $e/$4 > > > (or $j/$4 for 111) > > > > > > Also a question: Should we display 100$j (Attribution qualifier)? I > > > don't > > > know if I have ever used it, but seems like it should show if present (and > > > all if repeated) > > > > > > I think that is it then, trying to catch all the cases but so many little > > > details to watch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
