http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14198
--- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Hi Hector, > I filed a new bug > <http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14304> for XSLTs > in OPAC and Intranet to show the link for Publisher like 260 field. I will > correct the link for the OPAC there. Thx! Sorry for causing you more work. :( > Just one comment on etc/zebradb/biblios/etc/bib1.att > @@ +220,4 @@ > > att 9010 cn-suffix > > att 9011 Suppress > > att 9012 Identifier-other > > +#att 9013 arp > This is an index that really exist in the bottom of the file, I put it there > in a commented line because it tends to confuse, this was eliminated from > the new patch. Ah, that makes sense - I didn't spot that from the patch file. One more thought looking at this a bit more awake: Currently the new and the old indexes look as they will be mostly identical - they both index 260 and 264. I see the note about the Provider index being based on a suggestion from LOC, so that makes sense to me. But do we really need the other 2 new indexes Provider-place and Provider-date? Should we make them different or maybe just map them as an alias in ccl.properties to the existing indexes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
