http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10455
Galen Charlton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Magnus Enger from comment #1) > I seem to remember someone saying that we should keep the iso2709 in > biblioitems.marc, because if you want to export e.g. 500k records in iso2709 > format, transforming all those records from marcxml on the fly would be > *really* heavy. But I might be wrong... Sure, if you want ISO2709 and are starting from MARCXML, converting to ISO2709 for an export will consume a bit more CPU than dumping pre-existing ISO2709 directly... but (a) the cost of conversion is not that much, (b) exports are relatively infrequent operations, (c) and as such, better to pay the cost during exports than to (admittedly slightly) slow down the operation of saving or modifying a bib record. I'm taking of removing the "In Discussion" status in the hopes that somebody takes up writing a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
