http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12252

--- Comment #46 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Gaetan Boisson from comment #38)
> Adding a note to the OAI-PMH preference so that it reads like the following
> would be ok for me:
> 
> able/disable Koha's OAI-PMH server. The data exposed will not include items
> hidden through the OpacHiddenItems system preference, but everything else
> will be available for harvest. If you need to hide some data, look into
> extended mode and the OAI-PMH:ConfFile system preference.
> 
> (It does look to me as enabling extended mode with a configuration file
> allowing only one type of metadata that would result from a custom xslt
> removing the confidential fields would be enough.)

I liked this idea from Gaetan. But thinking about it more I am still torn:

This is a change in behaviour. People might have built things assuming the item
data is not there and might suddenly expose more data, than they wanted to.

I know that Jonathan is probably right in that this was initially a regression
from bug 5579, but we missed to fix this for a really long time now :(

Would it be really bad to make the items a configuration option? I know some
people hate new prefs... but the Web Services tab still has plenty of room...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to