http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14527
--- Comment #23 from Pedro Ferreira <[email protected]> --- Hello , yes i can confirm that there is no 999$c field doing a grep i get xekhz@mail:/var/www/koha3.20/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios$ grep 999 biblio-zebra-indexdefs.xsl <xslo:stylesheet xmlns:xslo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"; xmlns:z="http://indexdata.com/zebra-2.0"; xmlns:kohaidx="http://www.koha-community.org/schemas/index-defs"; version="1.0"> but i think the filed 995 is what i need, because date-of-aquisition is field 995 in unimarc. doing a grep xekhz@mail:/var/www/koha3.20/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios$ grep 995 biblio-zebra-indexdefs.xsl <xslo:template mode="index_subfields" match="marc:datafield[@tag='995']"> <xslo:template mode="index_data_field" match="marc:datafield[@tag='995']"> <xslo:template mode="index_facets" match="marc:datafield[@tag='995']"> xekhz@mail:/var/www/koha3.20/etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios$ ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
