http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14588
--- Comment #7 from M. Tompsett <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #1) > >(Note that Class::->method is preferred above Class->method. See perlobj.) > > I did not find where it's written it's better. > I personally think you are adding a third way where we already have new CGI > and CGI->new... I agree that "better" is not the word used. However, it is expressly explicit in how Perl should interpret the call. There is something to be said positively for explicitness. "Because Perl allows you to use barewords for package names and subroutine names, it sometimes interprets a bareword's meaning incorrectly." http://perldoc.perl.org/perlobj.html#Invoking-Class-Methods Though, I do share Jonathan's view that CGI->new is sufficient. This explicit syntax is an example of confusing ugliness that I personally would prefer to avoid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
