http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5347
--- Comment #27 from Francois Charbonnier <[email protected]> 2011-12-09 12:58:06 UTC --- I was thinking about it. In the end, if we have this : <record> <<biblio.title>> <item><<item.callnumber>>.</item> </record> How do we manage <<aqorders.quantity>> for the ACQCLAIM notice? Moreover, I don't think it's relevant to manage item level information within ACQCLAIM notice (even if libraries create item at this level)... Because I don't think vendors care about itemcallnumber, barcode or location for a specific library... So, before doing something like that, maybe we should do a RFC and dig this up with librarians who order books, etc. I've been into that position years ago but I'm interested about what other librarians could say. On the IRC, Katrin said that for the moment, we could just rename this tag and it would enough. Katrin, did you mean "rename the tag for every notice" or "rename the tag for the ACQCLAIM notice only"? If we rename the tag, i suggest <list> : * within the odue notice, it's a list of books where we can get biblio and item level information. * within the acqclaim notice, it's also a list of books where we can get only biblio level information. (PS : if you know situations where the vendor will be interested knowing item level information, let me know, I'm interested!) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
