http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10662
--- Comment #48 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- Of course, adding a "metadata" table might not be a great idea, because it would be "yet another place" that we store metadata. There's already biblioitems.marcxml (and the soon to be removed biblioitems.marc), Zebra, biblio/biblioitems/items relational fields. I think "metadata" might be a good idea as a long-term shift, but it might be met with resistance in the short-term. That said, if we're going to move away from MARC, surely we need to start transitioning to infrastructure which is independent of MARC. But that's why I think we need community discussion and a decision (not necessarily consensus) on the best way to proceed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
